检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中农业大学社会学系/农村社会建设与管理研究中心,湖北武汉430070
出 处:《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第2期35-43,共9页Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目(10ASH007);教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(11YJC840010);中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目(2012SC45)
摘 要:本文基于中国综合社会调查(CGSS2006)的问卷数据,考察了中国农村子女赡养行为的现状。农村子女的家庭禀赋对其赡养行为影响的定序Logistic回归分析结果表明:农村子女家庭禀赋效应对赡养行为的影响主要通过对父母的经济支持产生作用。具体来说,农村子女家庭禀赋越丰富,其对父母经济支持的频率越高,对父母精神慰藉的频率也有一定程度的正向影响,但是对父母生活照料的频率几乎没有影响。其中,家庭经济资本的作用无论是体现在对父母的经济支持还是精神慰藉都处在最主要的位置;家庭社会资本对提供父母经济支持的频率有显著的正向影响;家庭自然资本对提供父母精神慰藉和生活照料的频率有不同程度的正向影响。Using the data from the Chinese General Social Survey(CGSS2006),this paper examined the currentsituation of China's rural children support acts. Logistic regression analysis showed that: the impact of rural adultchildren's family endowment on their care-giving behaviors is mainly completed through the financial support.Specifically,the more family endowment the rural children have,the higher their frequencies to financially supporttheir own parents are,and there is also a certain degree of positive effect on the frequency of comforting their pa-rental mental needs,but almost no effect on the frequency of parental life care-giving. Among them,the role of thefamily's economic capital,whether reflected in the parent's financial support or spiritual solace,occupies a lead-ing position;family social capital has a significant positive effect on the frequency of providing financial supportfor parents;family natural capital has a varying degrees of positive effect on the frequencies of providing parentsspiritual solace and life-care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222