检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北大学,保定071002
出 处:《工业技术经济》2014年第4期124-130,共7页Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
摘 要:在城市群引领新型城镇化的背景下,本文针对京津冀城市群发展现状及演化过程进行了实证分析,考察了京津冀城市群的城市等级分布特征和城市群的规模结构,研究表明:京津冀城市群首位度小于2,首位城市优势不突出,京津形成双核心城市,同时,分析结构表明,豪斯道夫数值有大于1的趋势,这说明近些年来,京津冀城市群的中小城市有了一定发展,逐渐向规模结构合理性过度,最后,文章提出了优化京津冀城市群规模结构的政策建议。Under the background of urban agglomeration to lead the new urbanization , according to development and evolution pro-cess of Beijing -Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration , this papercarrys on the empirical analysis which investigates the distribution charac-teristics of city grading of the Beijing -Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration and urban agglomeration scale structure . Research has shown that the first city degree of Beijing -Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration is less than 2 , and the first city advantage is not outstanding , and Beijing-Tianjin forms a dual core city . At the same time , the analysis of the structure shows that the Hausdorff value is greater than 1 , which shows that the small and medium -sized cities have a certain development of the Beijing -Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration and gradually to the scale structure rationality in recent years . In the end , the article puts forward policy recommendations to optimize the scale structure of Beijing -Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249