科技文献中正交试验表的组合设计与编排——以发表在科技期刊中的文章为例  

Combinational design and arrangement of orthogonal-factor tables in published sci-tech literatures: a case of orthogonal-test tables in papers published in academic journals

作　　者：程红[1] 胡彦波 

机构地区：[1]<东北林业大学学报>编辑部 [2]<林业研究>编辑部,哈尔滨150040

出　　处：《编辑学报》2014年第2期134-137,共4页Acta Editologica

摘　　要：在CNKI中国知网数据库中检索了2012年1月—2013年4月涉及用正交试验方法文章的核心期刊共128种,涵盖30余个学科。分析发现:除方差分析表外,在已刊发文章中涉及正交试验的表格有6种,不同文章使用的表格数量和形式不一,至少有14种组合。剖析了不同组合表格的利弊,给出了出版用表格的合理组合和编排格式,正交试验设计应由①因素水平表、②试验设计方案及结果表、③极差分析表、④方差分析表等4个表格组合起来反映试验结果。In the CNKI （China National Knowledge Intemet） database, we searched the orthogonal design-related papers during January 2012 to April 2013. The survey involved a total of 128 core journals, covering more than 30 disciplines. Our analysis showed that, except analysis of variance table, the orthogonal design- related papers involved six types of tables with inconsistent number and combination type of tables in different journals, and at least 14 types of table combinations. In this paper, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of all the table combinations and propose the optimal combination and arrangement of orthogonal- factor tables in a paper. We recommend a combination of four tables （orthogonal factor level table, test design and result table, range analysis, and ANOVA table） to present the results of an orthogonal experimental design.

关 键 词：科技文献 正交试验 表格设计 表格遴选 

分 类 号：G232[文化科学]