检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《新中医》2014年第5期159-161,共3页New Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察中西医结合治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床效果。方法:选取110例骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组各55例,对照组采用过伸复位、口服乐力钙治疗,必要时加用物理治疗,治疗组在对照组治疗的基础上联合中药方剂进行治疗,对比2组治疗前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分情况及治疗效果。结果:治疗前,2组VAS评分比较,差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。治疗后及随访3月后,2组VAS评分均较治疗前下降(P<0.05);治疗组治疗后及随访3月后的VAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。总有效率治疗组94.55%,对照组81.82%,2组总有效率比较,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:采用中西医结合疗法治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折疗效确切。Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect of integrated Chinese and western medicine therapy medicine in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fracture. Methods: One hundred and ten osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fracture patients were randomly divided into the treatment group and control group, 55 cases in each group. The control group was given hyperextendibility reset and oral use of Osteoform, and physical therapy when necessary. The treatment group was treated with Chinese medicine prescription based on the treatment for the control group. The clinical effect and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were observed before and after treatment. Results: Before treatment, the difference of VAS scores between the two groups was insignificant (P 〉 0.05). After treatment and three-month follow-up, VAS scores of both group were decreased (P 〈 0.05 compared with those before treatment), and the scores were lower in the treatment group than those in the control (P 〈 0.05). The total effective rate was 94.55% in the treatment group and was 81.82% in the control group, the difference being significant(P 〈0,05). Conclusion. Integrative Chinese and western medicine exerts certain effect in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fracture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80