检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:伍玉春
机构地区:[1]江西省南康市南康新华医院妇产科,江西南康341400
出 处:《中国当代医药》2014年第12期187-188,共2页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨妇产科腹部手术切口液化的临床诊断及治疗,并研究切口液化的原因。方法以2009年7月。2013年7月来院行腹部手术后出现切口液化的66例患者为研究对象,将其随机分为观察组和对照组进行治疗,每组各33例。观察组患者采用微波法治疗,对照组患者采用常规法治疗。比较观察组和对照组患者在切口愈合时间及临床疗效方面的差异。结果两组患者的平均年龄、手术方式、合并疾病方面差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);观察组患者的切口愈合时间较短,治疗结果为治愈和有效的例数较多,总有效率较高,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论合并有糖尿病、肥胖、贫血、妊娠水肿等基础性疾病的腹部手术患者发生切口液化的风险较高,微波治疗切口液化的效果较好,可促进切口早期愈合。Objective To investigate the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gynecological abdominal operation incision liquefaction,and study the reason incision liquefaction. Methods 66 patients for abdominal operation incision after liq- uefaction as the research object in our hospital from July 2009 to July 2013.They were randomly divided into the ob- servation group and control group,33 patients in each group.The observation group patients were treated by microwave therapy,the control group patients were treated by routine therapy.The differences in clinical efficacy of wound healing time between the observation group and control group were compared. Results The two patients of the mean age,opera- tion mode,and different diseases had no statistical significance (P〉0.05),the observation group patients wound healing time was shorter,the cure and effective treatment for the patients with large number,high efficiency,the above index dif- ference had statistical significance (P〈0.05). Conclusion Abdominal operation patients complicated with diabetes,obe- sity,anemia,edema of pregnancy and other basic diseases incision liquefaction risk is higher,but the microwave treat- ment of incision liquefaction effect is good,and can promote early healing of incision.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

