检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾先峰[1]
机构地区:[1]西安外国语大学经济金融学院,西安710128
出 处:《干旱区资源与环境》2014年第5期47-52,共6页Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(11YJC790258);国家社会科学基金重大项目(项目编号:12&ZD072)资助
摘 要:矿区生态环境持续恶化的根源在于资源环境产权制度的缺失。我国矿产资源产权制度主要存在所有权、管理权、经营权混淆导致权责不清,采矿权权能残缺,以及一元矿权与二元地权的矛盾与冲突问题。对环境质量的使用权尚没有在法律层面上进行明确界定。对榆林矿区的实证研究表明,在矿产资源开发中利益主体与生态补偿的责任主体严重背离。只有从改革资源环境产权制度着手,才有望建立完善的矿区生态补偿机制,从而彻底解决矿区生态环境问题。Continued deterioration of ecological environment in mining areas is rooted in the lack of resources environment right. Many problems exist in China 's mineral resources management,such as unclear confines between rights and liabilities,the incomolete function of mining,as well as the conflicts of monadic mining rights and dual land tenure. As far as the environment right,it is still not clearly defined on a legal level. The empirical studies about Yulin district show that there exists a significant departure between the gains and the ecological compensation liability among mining companies,local governments and the central government. In order to improve the mechanism of ecological compensation of mine,we desiderate to clearly define the responsibilities and rights of stakeholders.
分 类 号:X37[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49