生命质量评价量表SF-36中国量化标准研究  

Scaling the SF-36 in a Chinese Population

作　　者：李俊[1] 刘朝杰[1] 李宁秀[1] 何廷尉[1] 李秉瑜[1] 

机构地区：[1]华西医科大学公共卫生学院社会医学教研室,成都610041

出　　处：《华西医科大学学报》2001年第1期36-38,47,共4页Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences

基　　金：卫生部科研基金资助! (B10 6 9)

摘　　要：目的　为便于跨文化研究 ,采用模糊数学的原理对 SF- 36进行中国量化标准研究。方法　在某城市按年龄、性别和职业分层抽取 6 5 0人 ,对 SF- 36的 8个领域中的 6个备择答案超过 2个的领域进行量化值区间估计。共收回有效问卷 6 46份。结果　多数答案等级的区间估计值的模糊度小于 0 .5 ,仅第一领域“躯体活动功能”有 4个答案等级的区间估计模糊度大于 0 .5。采用中国评分标准后 ,SF- 36的 8个领域得分值的高低顺位更接近原量表假设。结论　本研究研制的量化标准更适合于中国人群。建议将第一领域“躯体活动功能”的 3个答案等级简化为“是”“否”Objective To facilitate the cross cultural comp arison, we employed the principles of fuzzy mathematics in scaling the SF 36 in a Chinese populati on. Methods We stratified an urban population according to the age, sex, and oc cupation, and selected 650 people to participate in the study. A total of 646 va lid questionnaires were returned. In the 8 domains of the SF 36, the interval e stimation of the scores of different alternative answers of 6 domains which have more than 2 alternative answers were conducted. Results The fu zzy degrees of m ost interval estimations were less than 0.5, except 4 estimations in the domain 'physical functions'. The ordering of the scores of 8 domains was more similar t o the original assumption by our scaling criteria than by the US scaling criteri a. Conclusion The scaling criteria set in this study is more s uitable for use in Chinese population and we suggest that the alternative answers of the domain 'physical functions' be simplified to “yes” and “no”.

关 键 词：SF-36 量化 生命质量评价 量化标准 

分 类 号：R195.1[医药卫生—卫生统计学]