塑性弹力夹板与普通小夹板治疗桡骨远端伸直型骨折的疗效比较  

Curative Effect of Plastic Elastic Splint and Ordinary Small Splint Treating Facture of Distal End of Radius

作　　者：张建 

机构地区：[1]四川省都江堰市骨伤专科医院,611800

出　　处：《临床合理用药杂志》2014年第12期88-89,共2页Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use

摘　　要：目的比较塑性弹力夹板与普通小夹板在桡骨远端发生伸直型骨折患者中的治疗效果。方法选取本院2009年1月—2013年1月收治的桡骨远端发生伸直型骨折的患者120例,随机分为对照组和研究组两组,每组60例。研究组采用塑性弹力夹板行外固定治疗,对照组采用小夹板行外固定治疗,对比两组治疗后效果以及治疗1个月后骨折移位与腕关节外形情况。结果研究组总有效率96.7%,治愈率91.7%;对照组总有效率86.7%,治愈率80.0%;两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗1个月后,研究组骨折移位及腕关节外形评分均较对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论塑性弹力夹板治疗桡骨远端发生伸直型骨折的效果与小夹板外固定比较,骨折愈合效果更佳,更值得推广。Objective To compare the effect of plastic elastic splint and ordinary small splint treating facture of distal end of radius. Methods 12O patients with facture of distal end of radius in our hospital from Jan. 2OO9 to Jan. 2O13,were ran-domly divided into study group and controll group,6O cases in each group. The study group was treated with plastic elastic splint,the controll group was treated with ordinary small splint. Clinical effect of two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of study group was 96. 7% ,cure rate was 91. 7% ,which were higher than 86. 7% and 8O. O% of controll group, the differences were statiscally significant（P 〈 O. O5）. The score of fracture displacement and wrist shape in study group were less than controll group,the difference was statiscally significant（P 〈 O. O5）. Conclusion Effect of plastic elastic splint trea-ting distal end of radius is better than ordinary small splint,which is worthy of promotion.

关 键 词：夹板 小夹板固定 桡骨骨折 治疗结果 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]