政治权力异化后的社会正义之殇——续审马克思《黑格尔法哲学批判》的文本逻辑  

The Sorrow of Social Justice with Political Power Alienation

作　　者：炎冰[1] 熊一[2] 

机构地区：[1]扬州大学商学院,江苏扬州225009 [2]扬州大学社会发展学院,江苏扬州225009

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2014年第1期14-20,49,共8页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：江苏省高校211建设项目(SQB0813A4)

摘　　要：作为通向未来哲学革命"道口"的思想实验性作品,《黑格尔法哲学批判》(手稿)的意义仍待挖掘。针对黑格尔的国家主义观,青年马克思凭籍古典自由主义和人本学理想主义对其有关王权问题认知的批判逻辑,主要集中在形式与内容、主体与客体以及必然与偶然之三重矛盾的揭示上,而对其行政权内容的批判,则是通过对市民社会的私人利益与国家形式的公共利益的对峙,以及官僚政治实践过程的法理依据的合理性问题之诘难来凸显青年马克思自己的政治哲学之基本座架,但此时的基本立场依旧是隐性唯心史观和空想社会主义的逻辑。As an experimental product leading to future philosophical revolution,the significance of CritiqueofHegel＇sPhilosophyofRight（manuscript）remains to be unearthed.By virtue of the critical logic of classical liberalism and humanism ideal cognition on the kingship,Marx＇s critique on Hegel＇s view of nationalism focuses on three contradictions：form and content,subject and object as well as the necessity and contingency.But the critique of its administrative power is through the public confrontation of private interest of Civil society and public inters of national form,as well as the censure of rational problems of the legal basis for some bureaucratic practice process to highlight the young Marx＇s political philosophy,but the basic position at this time is still the hidden historical idealism and utopian socialism logic.

关 键 词：权力异化 社会正义 马克思 法哲学 

分 类 号：B01[哲学宗教—哲学理论]