检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]作者单位:310006杭州市第一人民医院消化科
出 处:《中华消化内镜杂志》2014年第4期210-212,共3页Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
摘 要:目的探讨对经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)预切开或开窗方法后胆管插管失败者,行第2次ERCP操作的价值。方法167例患者术前拟诊胆总管结石和/或良性乳头狭窄109例,胆胰占位性病变58例。第一次ERCP标准胆管插管均在20min以上,不能成功后作预切开或开窗术,再反复试插后仍未能成功;3~5d后,再次行ERCP;第2次ERCP大多数患者按胆胰管合流水平位、前位和后位顺序插管。结果133例(79.6%)经第2次ERCP获得成功,其中水平位插管成功85例,前位插管成功36例,后位插管成功12例。插管成功后顺利完成了内镜的相应治疗。1例发生乳头穿孔伴后腹膜感染,1例并发重症胰腺炎形成胰周脓肿,均经腹腔穿刺引流方法治愈。结论经过更缜密的准备,掌控好胆管插管技巧,再次ERCP仍有较高的成功率。Objective To study the therapeutic value of a second ERCP for the patients with failure of pre-cut ERCP. Methods A total of 167 cases of pre-cut ERCP failure were recruited to the study, among which 109 cases were diagnosed as common bile duct stones and/or benign papillary stenosis, and 58 cases as biliopancreatic lesion. ERCP failed with standard intubation for more than 20 minutes, even with pre-cut or fenestration. A second ERCP was preformed after rest of 3-5 days. The position sequence of intubation for most patients was horizontal, the front and rear. Results The success rate was 79. 6% ( 133 cases) for the patients with a second ERCP, 85 patients received the procedures via the horizontal intubation, 36 via anteri- or, and 12 via posterior intubation. The treatments were performed after successful completion of the endo- scopic cannulation. One patient had retroperitoneal infection with duodenal perforation, another patient had severe pancreatitis, who were cured by the intervention methods. Conclusion The success rate of a second ERCP is high with proficient intubation skills.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.124