检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉纺织大学会计学院,湖北武汉430073 [2]武汉纺织大学管理学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2014年第5期20-26,共7页Forum on Science and Technology in China
基 金:教育部人文社科基金(09YJC630183);湖北省教育厅人文社科基金(13g304)
摘 要:本文首先评析了技术创新中的需求拉动论、技术推动论与政府引导论,然后以装备制造业中的专用设备上市公司2009—2011年数据作为研究样本,实证检验了政府补贴、市场需求与企业技术创新之间的关系,特别是考察市场需求是否具有中介或调节效应。最后以国家自主创新示范区东湖高新区内精伦电子、华中数控等企业为案例进一步阐明了这三者之间的关系。研究发现,政府补贴和市场需求与企业R&D投入显著正相关,市场需求对政府补贴与企业R&D投入之间不存在中介效应。研发投入与企业创值能力显著正相关,市场需求对企业R&D投入与创值能力有显著的正调节效应,而政府补贴对R&D投入与企业创值能力存在显著负调节效应。政府补贴与企业盈利能力显著正相关。This paper reviews the argumentation of innovation driving factor-demand-pull theory, technology-push theory and govern- ment-led theory. It takes the sample of special equipment sector of the equipment manufacturing industry as an empirical test of the rela- tionship between the government R&D subsidy, market demand and firm innovation. The paper focuses on whether market demand has a mediating or moderating effect. The cases of Jinglun Electronic and Huazhong CNC demonstrate a further evidence for the relationship of the above three. The results implicate that both government subsidy and market demand are positively related to finn R&D invest- menL Market demand has no mediating effect on the relationship between government subsidies and finn R&D investment. R&D investment has a significant positive effect on value creation ability, but an insignificant negative effect on profitability. Market demand has a positive moderating impact on R&D investment and value creation ability. However, government R&D subsidy shows a negative moderating effect. Government subsidy exposes a significant positive effect on performance.
分 类 号:F062.3[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42