检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国计量学院经济与管理学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]对外经济贸易大学中国WTO研究院,北京100029
出 处:《国际商务研究》2014年第3期5-15,共11页International Business Research
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目--"我国‘入世’以来利用WTO争端解决机制解决中美贸易争端的实践与经验研究"(项目编号:12JJD790022)
摘 要:世界贸易组织下的《SPS协定》、《等效决议》以及CAC、OIE、IPPC制定的对等承认准则共同构成了SPS措施等效承认机制。但这个机制缺少法律约束,也存在相关方之间权利失衡、等效承认时限不清等问题,这导致国际SPS措施的等效承认的实施陷入困境。国际SPS措施的等效承认是消除贸易技术壁垒的重要途径。世界贸易组织应重视完善SPS措施对等承认机制,以更好地推动世界贸易的发展。The system of recognition of equivalence of SPS measures under the World Trade Organization consists of the SPS Agreement, Decision on Equivalence and the Various Guidelines for the Judgement of Equivalence established and implemented by CAC, OIE and IPPC. This system has such deficiencies as soft legal binding, unbalanced rights held by different interested parties, unclear deadline for judgement of equivalence, etc., which cause the international recognition of equivalence of SPS measures to be in a dilemma of development. The recognition of equivalence of international SPS measures is an important way to eliminate international technical barriers. The WTO should put emphsis on improvement of the equivalence system of the SPS measures and thereby promote the development of international trade.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.140.58