检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湘潭大学商学院,湘潭411105 [2]哈尔滨工业大学深圳研究生院,深圳518055
出 处:《中央财经大学学报》2014年第5期52-59,共8页Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71103154);中国博士后基金项目(2012M511452);湖南省教育厅重点基金项目(12A141);湖南省自科基金项目(13JJ3066)
摘 要:笔者基于2003—2012年中国房地产上市公司的面板数据,运用固定效应模型进行实证分析,结果表明,国家宏观调控政策越宽松,房地产上市公司财务风险越大;宏观调控政策越严厉,增加股东大会和监事会召开次数有利于降低企业财务风险。在公司治理结构对财务风险的影响方面,扩大董事会规模,提高股权集中度和高管薪酬,能较好地降低企业的财务风险;较低的股权制衡度有利于降低企业财务风险,但其效果不显著。基于以上结论,我国房地产企业应当不断优化股权结构,适当提高股权集中度,提升股东大会和监事会会议质量;强化董事会下设委员会职能,采用适当的董事会规模,建立良好的高管激励机制。This paper has made an empirical analysis with fixed effects regression model based on the panel data of listed real estate companies from 2003 to 2012. The result shows that: firstly, the more liberal the national macro-control policies are, the greater the financial risk of real estate listed companies will be. Secondly, with strict national macro-control policies and more times of shareholders' meeting and the board of supervisors, the corporate financial risk will reduce greatly. Thirdly, with larger board of directors, higher ownership concentration and execu- tive compensation, the companies can effectively reduce the financial risk. Lastly, low equity restriction is also helpful to reduce the corporate financial risk but it is no so significant. Based on the above conclusions, Chinese re- al estate enterprises should continue to optimize the equity structure, increase the ownership concentration appropri- ately and enhance the quality of the Shareholders' meeting and the board of supervisors' meeting. Meanwhile they should also continue to strengthen the functions of the Committee under the Board, using the appropriate size of the Board and establish a good executive incentive mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.7.99