检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国国土资源经济》2014年第4期59-63,共5页Natural Resource Economics of China
基 金:教育部人文社科项目(12YJC790267);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71273038)
摘 要:采用泰尔熵和MLD指数对我国总体及四大经济区新增工业用地效率的区域差异性进行了测度和分解,并对31个省份新增工业用地利用效率的变化规律进行了探寻。结果表明:从静态角度看,总体、经济区间及其内部的差距都呈缩小趋势。从动态角度看,经济区间的差距变动先缩小了总体差距后又扩大了总体差距,而经济区内部的差距一直缩小了总体差距。从省际角度看,各省新增工业用地利用效率呈梯度转移态势。This paper estimates and explains the regional differences in the new industrial land efifciency of China as a whole and four major economic zones by theil entropy coefifcient and MLD index;and it also makes an exploration in the changing rule of the new industrial land use efifciency of 31 provinces. The results show that, from static point of view, the whole country, the differences between economic zones and their internal differences become shorten. From dynamic point of view, for the change of the gap between economic zones, the whole disparities are narrowed and then expanded;while the intra-EMR disparities have narrowed the gap as a whole. From the point of view on a provincial, the provincial new industrial land use efifciency has showed the gradient transfer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28