检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国现代医生》2014年第10期116-118,共3页China Modern Doctor
基 金:浙江省中医药科技计划(2010ZB120)
摘 要:目的 探讨细节化护理管理在老年胃癌手术患者围术期的应用效果.方法 选择2011年1月~2013年1月在我院手术室择期实施胃癌手术的65岁及以上患者66例作为观察对象,根据干预措施不同分为干预组和对照组各33例,比较两组患者的围术期各项护理质量管理评分、术后SAS评分、SDS评分、术后症状自评量表(SCL-90)各项评分.结果 干预组患者的护理质量管理总评分(96.2±1.7),明显高于对照组(72.3±10.8)(P< 0.05).干预组患者术后SAS、SDS评分分别较对照组明显降低(P<0.05).干预组患者术后躯体化、强迫、人际关系、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执、精神病性、其他各项评分较对照组比较明显低于对照组(P<0.05).结论 细节化护理管理有利于提高护理质量,改善患者的负性心理状态,使其积极配合手术.Objective To investigate the effect of details care management for elderly gastric patients. Methods A total of 66 cases were divided into intervention group and control group 33 cases, rated the quality of care management, postoperative SAS score, SDS score, postoperative SCL-90 score were compared. Results The intervention group patient care quality management total score was (96.2±1.7), was significantly higher than the control group (72.3 ±10.8)(P 〈 0.05). SAS, SDS scores of intervention group were significantly lower than the control group (P 〈 0.05). Intervention group patients were somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, paranoia,psychosis,various other score of intervention group was significantly lower than the control group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The details care man- agement can improve the quality of care and he negative psychological state of patients, and make them actively coop- erate with the surgery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.247.141