多向分体式与传统三爪持骨器的临床疗效比较  

Effect of multidimensional separate bone holding forceps and traditional three-claw bone holding forceps

作　　者：张明友[1,2] 陈德元[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]广州中医药大学附属中山医院 [2]中山市中医院骨外科,广东中山528400

出　　处：《中国现代医生》2014年第13期86-89,共4页China Modern Doctor

基　　金：广东省中山市科技计划项目(20113A038)

摘　　要：目的比较多向分体式持骨器与传统三爪持骨器用于手术治疗股骨干骨折的疗效。方法将收治的135例股骨干骨折患者,按入院次序,分为A、B两组:A组(奇数者)用多向分体式持骨器维持复位后位置,B组(偶数者)用传统三爪持骨器维持复位后位置。比较两组在切口长度、手术时间、失血量、骨折愈合时间、并发症等方面的情况。结果 A组与B组在切口长度、并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),在手术时间、失血量、骨折愈合时间等方面比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论与使用传统三爪持骨器相比,使用多向分体式持骨器治疗四肢长骨干骨折能缩短手术时间,减少术中失血,缩短骨折愈合时间。Objective To compare the clinical effect of femoral shaft fractures with using the multidimensional separate bone holding and the traditional three-claw bone holding in the operation. Methods A total of 135 cases of femoral shaft fractures were compared based on their sequence, group A（the odd number） were treated with the multidimension- al separate bone holding;group B（the even number） were treated with the traditional three-claw bone holding;and then the length of incision, the time of operation, the lost blood during the operation, the time for those fractures to get eica- trisation, the complication were compared. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of incision and the complication（P〉0.05）. The group A had significant advantages than group B in the time of op- eration,the lost blood during the operation,the time for those fractures to get eieatrisation （P〈0.01）. Conclusion Com- pare with the traditional three-claw bone holding, the multidimensional separate bone holding can shorten the time of operation and the time for the fractures get cicatrisation, can reduce the lost blood during the operation.

关 键 词：股骨干骨折 持骨器 手术 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]