检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘孟昀 陈怀良[2] 李雨辰[1] 李胜德[1] 罗交 张建新[1]
机构地区:[1]四川大学华西公共卫生学院(华西第四医院),四川成都610041 [2]成都市双流县第二人民医院预防保健科,四川成都610213
出 处:《现代预防医学》2014年第9期1642-1644,共3页Modern Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的开发新型毒品吸食风险评估量表,探索量表的效度。方法以新型毒品吸食人员和在校职高学生共计891人为研究对象对量表效度进行研究。采用因子分析对量表维度进行探索,采用德尔菲专家咨询法和Pearson相关分析对量表效度进行分析,通过统计描述及t检验确定量表风险界值。结果因子分析显示量表可分为3个维度,统计分析表明量表具有良好的内容效度和结构效度,最终将量表风险界值定为30分,能有效区分新型毒品吸食人员和一般人群。结论《华西新型毒品吸食风险量表》效度良好,区分度较高。Objective To develop West China Assessment Scale for Synthetic Drug Abusing Risk (DRS) and to explore the validity of the scale. Methods A sample of 110 synthetic drug abusers and 781 students were selected to analyze the validity of the scale. Factor analysis was adopted to explore the dimensions of the scale. Delphi expert method and Pearson correlation analysis were used to analyze the validity of the DRS. Statistical description and t test were used to identify the cut-off value of the DRS. Results Factor analysis showed the DRS could be divided into 3 dimensions. Statistical analysis indicated the DRS had good content validity and construct validity. The cut-off value for the DRS was 30 points, which could distinguish the two group of population effectively. Conclusion The DRS has satisfying validity and discrimination.
分 类 号:R195[医药卫生—卫生统计学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145