检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省德阳市第二人民医院,四川德阳618000
出 处:《中国医药指南》2014年第12期49-50,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的观察利多卡因与胺碘酮在发作急性室性心律失常的颅脑损伤患者中的疗效对比。方法 118例急性室性心律失常患者随机分成两组,分别给予利多卡因和胺碘酮行抗心律失常治疗,观察疗效。结果胺碘酮组在抗急性室性心律失常的治疗总有效率高于利多卡因组,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在颅脑损伤合并急性室性心律失常的治疗中,胺碘酮治疗效果优于利多卡因,可作为首选。Objective To Contrast the clinical efficacy of lidocaine and amindarone in the treatment of traumatic brain injury complicated by acute VehiCUlar an-hythmia. Methods 118 cases of patients were divided into two groups randomly. Each group were treated by lidocaine or arrfiodarone, observe the efficacy. Result The total effective rate of treatment of anti ventrieular arrhythmia, the group of amiodarone is better than the group of lidocaine, Statistically significant.(P〈0.05). Conclusions Contrast the trealment of Waurnatic brain injury complicated by acute veniricular arrhythmia, Amiodarone treatment is better than lidocaine, can be used as the first choice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.92.75