检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国 南方医科大学心理学系, 广州 510515
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2014年第4期612-615,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:国家科技支撑计划项目(编号:2009BAI77B01);广东省高校人文社科重大攻关项目(编号:2012ZGXM-0006);广东省哲学社会科学规划研究项目(编号:07SJY004);广东省思想政治教育课题(编号:2012ZY013);南方医科大学"科研启动计划"青年科技人员培育项目(校科字[2012]126号);南方医科大学公共卫生学院院长基金(编号:GW201244)的资助
摘 要:目的探讨爱与归属感在大学生安全感与幸福感之间的中介作用,以及恋爱状态在这三者关系模型中的调节作用。方法采用安全感量表、情感和社交孤寂量表以及幸福感指数量表调查1177名大一学生。结果恋爱组的人际安全因子得分高于非恋爱组,而非恋爱组情感孤寂与社交孤寂上的得分均高于恋爱组(均P<0.05);安全感的两个因子(即人际安全和控制感)和幸福感呈正相关(r=0.50,0.49;P<0.01);爱与归属感的两个因子(即情感孤寂和社交孤寂)与安全感的两个因子呈负相关(-0.55≤r≤-0.31,P<0.01),与幸福感呈负相关(r=-0.34,-0.50;P<0.01)。爱与归属感在安全感与幸福感之间起部分中介作用(中介效应为0.45,P<0.01)。恋爱状态在爱与归属感到幸福感这一路径之间起到了调节作用(r恋爱组=-0.22,r未恋爱组=-0.40;P<0.01)。结论安全感既可直接影响幸福感,也可通过爱与归属感来影响幸福感;恋爱状态在这三者中起调节作用。Objective To investigate the mediation role of love and belonging between the sense of security and well-being in college students as well as the moderating role of falling in love in the relational model constructed by them. Methods Totally 1177 freshmen were selected from a medical college and assessed with the Security Questionnaire ( SQ ) , Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale and Index of Well-Being. Results In this sample,love condition group scored higher than not love condition group in interpersonal safety factor, but lower in social and emotional loneliness( P 〈 0.05 ). Two factors of security( interpersonal safety and sense of control) were positively cor- related with well-being( r = 0. 50,0. 49;P 〈 0.01 ), two factors of love and belonging (emotional loneliness and social loneliness)were negatively correlated with well-being( r = 4). 34 ,-0.50 ;P 〈 0. 01 ). The model constructed by them fited the data well (x2/df 〈 5, P 〉 0.05, GFI 〉 0.90, RMSEA 〈 0.05 ). Love and belonging acted as a mediator between the sense of security and well-being, and the media- ting effect was 0.45 (P 〈 0.01 ). ;Love condition or not played a moderating role in the path of love and belonging to the well-being (r( in love) = 4). 22, r ( not in love ) = 4). 40, Ps 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Security can directly affect the well-being, but also influence well-being through love and belonging;Love condition or not plays a moderating role in them.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33