检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱青[1]
出 处:《财贸经济》2014年第5期5-13,共9页Finance & Trade Economics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"扩大内需的财税政策研究"(12JJD790051)
摘 要:本文在借鉴国外地方税体系经验的基础上,分析了我国在营业税淡出后地方税体系的建设问题,提出不能将房产税和企业所得税作为地方主体税种,更不能扩大增值税地方分享的比例;完善地方税体系的思路应当是开征零售环节的销售税划给地方,或者是改造现行的消费税,将一部分定额征收的消费税划给地方;另外,可以提高个人所得税地方分享的比例。本文认为,在完善地方税体系的过程中,应当取消增值税中央、地方共享的做法,由中央独享增值税收入;同时要改革转移支付制度,加大中央对地方的一般性转移支付。This paper, on the basis of drawing experiences from foreign countries, analyses the construction of China's sub national tax system after the fade-out of business tax, and points out that neither property tax nor corporation income tax is the appropriate main tax for sub-national governments, and moreover, the share of value-added tax for the sub-national governments should not be increased. The paper suggests that the central government enacts sales tax for sub-national governments, or reforms excise tax by allocating the lump sum part of it to the sub-national governments. In addition, the weight of individual income tax shared by the sub-national government might be raised. It argues that the revenue of VAT should not be shared between the central and sub-national governments, but be exclusively assigned to the central government; meanwhile, the central government should further enlarge the general grants to sub-national governments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.61.156