检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031
出 处:《河北法学》2014年第6期39-43,共5页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:为了平衡医患双方之合法权益,医方在医事诉讼中的强势地位,司法解释民事诉讼证据规则对医疗过错及其因果关系的证明实行责任倒置,而我国《侵权责任法》第七章实质上已经修正了民事诉讼证据规则的证明责任倒置的规定,医疗纠纷中举证责任倒置制度在我国已然名存实亡。在侵权责任法中有关医疗损害责任的规定虽然是民事实体法上新的制度安排,但作为弱势群体的患方权益仍然难以得到有效保障,为了找到医患双方利益的平衡点,在民事诉讼程序方面对于医疗过错证明责任的分配需要运用举证责任转换制度进行重新配置。Due to balance of the hospital and patients'right ,the reversion of dual burden of proof relating to medical tort was enacted by the Supreme People's Court on the Evidence in Civil Procedures,Now China's Tort Liability Law abolished the liability reversion of medical fault, its nature lead to peoples strange, Many people think the burden of proof of Medical tort lawsuits has been dead, the poor have be taken the measures and methods to mitigate and relief the patients" liability to prove the medical faults of hospital and the causal linkage between the action and fault. Consequently, In the further,the tort liability law need be improved in the future, the hospital itself should take the burden of proof of its fault" liability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42