检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓君韬[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2014年第6期127-135,共9页Hebei Law Science
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助科技创新项目:<中国铁路运营安全法律规制研究>(SWJTU12CX133)
摘 要:时有发生的铁路运营安全事故中,由于相关罪名认定可能存在竞合、刑罚处置可能存在空档的情形,故肩负安全监管职责的管理人员与铁路一线职工的刑责追究问题需细致厘析。在铁路系统曾经的"政企不分""独立司法"和铁路司法改革破冰,铁道部撤并、新设国家铁路局及中国铁路总公司,希求"政企分开"的大部制改革背景下,铁路检察实务打击渎职类行为时对犯罪主体问题应审慎甄别。As for the accidents occured during railway operation from time to time, since there might be overlaps of articles of law when cognizing crimes and blank gaps of articles of law when conducting punishments, it is quite neccessary to figure out the accountability of those managers who shoudering the security regulatory responsibility and those staffs who working at the front-line. In the railway system, under the circumstance of "Integrating Government Functions with Enterprise" and "Judicial Independence" , the icebreaking of reformation in railway justice, the removing and combinating of railway departments, the establishing of The National Railway Bureau and China Railway Corporation, as well as the Super- Ministries Reforming for the purpose of " Separating Government Functions from Enterprises", the determination of subjects of crime, when railway judicial institutionsfight against crimes of dereliction of duty, should be conducted scrupulously.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195