机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院关节外科,广州510080
出 处:《中国修复重建外科杂志》2014年第5期566-570,共5页Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81201388);中山大学临床研究5010计划项目(2013002)~~
摘 要:目的探讨变异髋臼的人工全髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty,THA)中髋臼假体选择性上移放置的方法及疗效。 方法2005年1月-2010年12月,收治26例(26髋)拟行THA的变异髋臼患者。男5例,女21例;年龄35~67岁,平均52.3岁。左髋11例,右髋15例。其中发育性髋关节发育不良22例,股骨头缺血性坏死3例,创伤性关节炎1例。术前Harris 评分为(45.85 ± 10.04)分。常规行骨盆正位、患侧股骨正侧位 X 线片、骨盆 CT 平扫及三维重建检查,采用TraumaCad软件进行术前设计。THA术中在尽量接近真臼位置且避免大量结构性植骨前提下,根据具体情况适当上移旋转中心,使髋臼假体能获得70%以上骨性包容,旋转中心上移不超过15 mm。 结果11例患侧旋转中心基本与健侧一致(5 mm以内);余15例行旋转中心上移,其中上移5~10 mm 8例,10~15 mm 7例。术中无骨折及神经损伤;术后患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无感染、下肢深静脉血栓形成等并发症发生。1例术后3 d发生关节脱位,经手法复位保守治疗后无再脱位。患者均获随访,随访时间15~71个月,平均34个月。末次随访时,Harris 评分达(91.42 ± 3.59)分,较术前显著提高(t=20.099,P=0.000);其中旋转中心基本与健侧一致、上移5~10 mm、10~15 mm者 Harris评分分别为(92.09 ± 4.04)、(91.25 ± 2.82)和(90.57 ± 3.95)分,各组间比较差异无统计学意义(F=0.377,P=0.690)。X线片复查示,随访期间假体均无松动、下沉。 结论 变异髋臼THA中以髋臼假体旋转中心尽可能放置在接近真臼位置前提下,适当上移(≤15 mm)假体以获得至少70%骨性包容和良好自身稳定性,可获得满意中期疗效,远期疗效有待进一步随访观察。Objective To investigate the method and effectiveness of selectively upward placement of acetabular implants in patients with anatomically abnormal acetabulum during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Twenty-six cases (26 hips) of anatomically abnormal acetabulum received THA between January 2005 and December 2010, including 22 cases of developmental dysplasia of the hip, 3 cases of osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and 1 case of post-traumatic arthritis. There were 5 males and 21 females with an average age of 52.3 years (range, 35-67 years). The left hip was involved in 11 cases and the right hip in 15 cases. The preoperative Harris score was 45.85 ± 10.04. The anteroposterior X-ray films and CT scan of the pelvis, anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of the femur, and TraumaCad analysis were performed routinely before operation. The principles of acetabular implants were that more than 70% of the bone-implant interface was covered, and the upward distance of acetabular implant was less than 15 mm. Results Acetabular implants were placed within 5 mm from the anatomical rotation center in 11 cases. The upward distance of acetabular implant was 5-10 mm in 8 cases and was 10-15 mm in 7 cases. No bone fracture or nerve injury was observed intraoperatively. All incisions healed by first intention, and no infection or lower limb deep venous thrombosis occurred. One case had dislocation at 3 days after operation, and was cured after reduction and conservative treatment. The follow-up time ranged from 15 to 71 months (mean, 34 months). The Harris score was 91.42 ± 3.59, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t=20.099, P=0.000). The Harris scores were 92.09 ± 4.04 in patients having less than 5 mm upward distance, 91.25 ± 2.82 in patients having 5-10 mm upward distance, and 90.57 ± 3.95 in patients having 10-15 mm upward distance, showing no significant difference (F=0.377, P=0.690). No loosening or subsidence of the implant was observed by X-ray film du
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...