检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学土木工程学院,辽宁大连116023
出 处:《地震工程与工程振动》2014年第2期137-145,共9页Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基 金:国家自然科学基金优秀青年科学基金项目(51222806);教育部博士点基金项目(20130041110031);霍英东基金基础性研究课题(141072)
摘 要:为了使可拓评价理论评价指标权重系数的取值更加合理,引入了指标重要性相关法(CRITIC法)来计算各指标的客观权重,并利用层次分析法(AHP法)计算各指标的主观权重,通过博弈论方法对主、客观权重进行集成,建立了一种更加合理的综合权重。文末以4个框架结构为例,采用本文方法及其他几种方法对其进行了地震损伤评估对比分析,结果表明综合权重克服了可拓评价理论中单一权重的不足,具有较大的优越性。In order to get the more reasonable weights of evaluation indexes of extension theory, the criteria impor- tance through inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC) method is introduced to calculate the objective weights while the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method is used to calculate the subjective weights. The integrated weights of in- dexes for extension assessment theory are established by combining the subjective and objective weights via game theory. Finally, taking four frame structures as example, the comparative analysis of seismic damage assessment is carried out by t^e proposed method and several other methods. The results indicate that the integrated weight of ex- tension evaluation theory overcomes the limitation of single weight, which has more advantages.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171