检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭丽明[1,2]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]江西科技师范大学法学院
出 处:《特区经济》2014年第4期209-211,共3页Special Zone Economy
摘 要:著作权纠纷仲裁解决机制与程序繁琐、周期冗长的诉讼方式相比,一方面,仲裁程序更为简化,当事人的权利能及时得到救济;另一方面,仲裁的一裁终局制度,缩短了争议解决的周期,确保了争议的快速高效解决。从我国目前在立法和实践的需要来看,著作权纠纷通过仲裁方式解决经历了由不明确规定到明确认定的一个转变过程,利用仲裁机制解决著作权纠纷就要发挥仲裁独特的优势,在效率和公平中找到恰当的平衡点,体现仲裁的生命力。Compared with cycle litigation, copyright trivial program and length disputes settlement mecha- nism has some advantages, on the one hand, arbitration procedure is more simplified, and the rights of the parties can get relief in a timely manner; on the other hand, the system of finality of arbitral award of arbi- tration shorten the cycle of dispute resolution to en- sure fast and efficient solution to the disputes. From the perspective of the need of the legislation and practice in China, copyright disputes resolved through arbitration has experienced that regulation is not clear to a clear recognition of the transformation pro- cess. To solve copyrights disputes by arbitration should full play the unique advantages of arbitration, and should reflect the vitality of the arbitration by finding the proper balance in the efficiency and fair- ness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3