酒石酸长春瑞滨热敏脂质体血管刺激性和急性毒性初步研究  被引量:3

Study on Vascular Stimulation and Acute Toxicity of Vinorelbine Tartrate Thermosensitive Liposomes

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:龚伟[1] 梅乐[1] 王志媛[1] 杨资伟[1] 狄忠[1] 梅兴国[1] 

机构地区:[1]军事医学科学院毒物药物研究所,北京100850

出  处:《解放军药学学报》2014年第2期107-109,共3页Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army

基  金:国家十二五重大专项;No.2012ZX09301003-001-009

摘  要:目的以酒石酸长春瑞滨注射液(VRB-I)为对照制剂,研究酒石酸长春瑞滨热敏脂质体(VRB-TL)的血管刺激性和急性毒性。方法家兔耳缘静脉输注VRB-I和VRB-TL进行血管刺激性考察;小鼠尾静脉输注VRB-I和VRB-TL观察其毒性反应和死亡情况。结果 VRB-I具有明显的血管刺激性,VRB-TL对血管没有明显的刺激作用。VRB-TL和VRB-I的小鼠半数致死剂量(LD50)相同,均为36 mg·kg-1。但VRB-TL的最大耐受剂量为23.04 mg·kg-1,高于VRB-I。结论 VRB-TL安全性优于VRB-I。Objective To study the vascular stimulation and acute toxicity of vinorelbine tartrate thermosen-sitive liposomes (VRB-TL) compared with vinorelbine tartrate injection (VRB-I). Methods Rabbits and Kunming mice were intravenously infused VRB-TL and VRB-I to investigate vascular stimulation and acute toxicity, respec- tively. Results Vascular stimulation in rabbits was not observed after intravenous infusion of VRB-TL or sodium chloride injection, but was observed after intravenous infusion of VRB-I. The LD50 of VRB-TL and VRB-I for mice was identical (36 mg·kg^-1 ) , but the maximum tolerated dosage of VRB-TL was 23.04 mg·kg^-1, which was higher than that of VRB-I. Conclusion The toxic and side effect of VRB-TL is lower than that of VRB-I.

关 键 词:酒石酸长春瑞滨 热敏脂质体 血管刺激性 急性毒性 

分 类 号:R973.1[医药卫生—药品] R965.3[医药卫生—药学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象