检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:檀慧玲[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学,北京100875
出 处:《国家教育行政学院学报》2014年第5期57-62,共6页Journal of National Academy of Education Administration
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(skzzp2013005);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大委托项目(12JZDW004)
摘 要:通过对中外大学决策权力运行机制进行比较研究,发现当前我国大学决策权力运行中存在体制不健全、民主化程度不高、决策监督机制不完善等问题。对此,应明确分工与职责,不断健全大学决策体制;加强决策制度建设,保证决策的规范有效;推进多元治理,增强大学决策的科学化和民主化。Through a comparative study on Chinese and foreign countries universities decision-making mechanisms, this paper finds some prominent problems in Chinese universities decision-making mechanism, such as that the system is not sound enough, the degree of democracy is not high, supervision is inadequate, etc. To further improve Chinese universities decision-making mechanism, there should be clear roles and responsibilities, and constant improvement of universities decision-making system; strengthening of the decision-making system construction, so as to ensure that decision-making is standardized and effective, to promote multiple governance, and to enhance universities decision-making scientific and democratic.
分 类 号:G647[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222