检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京工业大学材料化学工程国家重点实验室,江苏南京210009
出 处:《化工学报》2014年第5期1835-1839,共5页CIESC Journal
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2013CB733501);国家自然科学基金项目(21136004);江苏高校优势学科建设工程~~
摘 要:发展规模化畜禽养殖场的沼气工程对于减少环境污染、获得可再生能源意义重大,但我国沼气工程普遍盈利能力较弱。本文基于沼气发酵稳态模型,对我国与德国万头猪场的沼气工程经济性进行了分析对比。结果表明,沼气发酵工艺、发电机效率以及上网电价是影响沼气工程经济性的关键因素。目前偏低的电价[0.42元·(kW·h)?1]是导致沼气工程亏损的根本原因。在改善沼气工程和发电技术达到德国工艺水平的基础上,将目前采用的给予建设补贴而不关注运行效果的政策,改为重视实际减排效果,将上网电价提高到1.5元·(kW·h)?1,可使得项目投资回报期缩短为3年以内,对于加速我国沼气工程行业发展进程具有重要意义。Biogas projects of large & medium-scale husbandry farms are significant in reducing environmental pollution and getting access to renewable energy. However, they are all generally dependent on government subsidy in China, and their profitability is poor. In this work, we made contrastive analysis on the economy of pig farm biogas projects in China and Germany based on biogas fermentation steady-state model. Biogas fermentation process, generator efficiency and tariff are the key factors that affect economic efficiency. Currently, low electricity tariff [0.42 CNY·(kW·h)-1] is the root cause for the loss of biogas projects. On the basis of improving the technology of biogas and power generation and reaching the level in Germany, changing the policy of giving construction subsidies without paying attention to operational efficiency to attaching importance to actual emission reduction and increasing tariff to 1.5 CNY·(kW·h)-1can shorten the payback period of the project within 3 years, which is of great importance to accelerating the development of biogas industry in China.
分 类 号:S216.4[农业科学—农业机械化工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.244