检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:焦旸[1] 高涌[1] 余朝文[1] 陈世远[1] 周雪妃[2] 陈景侠[1] 韩梅[1] 孙友芳[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽省蚌埠医学院第一附属医院血管小儿外科,233004 [2]安徽省蚌埠医学院护理系,233000
出 处:《中华全科医学》2014年第6期1004-1006,共3页Chinese Journal of General Practice
摘 要:目的探讨将护理干预应用于主动脉夹层患者的护理效果。方法选择血管小儿外科2010年6月—2013年6月收治的主动脉夹层患者28例,随机分为对照组和观察组各14例,对照组采用常规护理,观察组采用护理干预,从术前焦虑、术后严重疼痛、护理有效率、患者满意度等方面,比较2组护理效果的差异。结果观察组的术前焦虑及术后严重疼痛的比例明显低于对照组,观察组的患者满意度及护理有效率高于对照组,差异显著。结论将护理干预应用于主动脉夹层患者,调动了他们的主观能动性和治疗依从性,极大地改善了医患、护患关系,保证了患者得到有效的治疗,明显提高了患者的生存质量,有效提高了患者的治愈率,推广了健康的生活方式,值得在临床应用。Objective To investigate the effects of nursing interventions in treatment of patients with aortic dissection. Methods Total 28 patients with aortic dissection in our department from June 2010 to June 2013 were randomly divided into control group and observation group with 14 cases in each group. The control group received conventional treatments, while the observation group received nursing intervention. The nursing efficacy was evaluated from the aspect of anxiety before surgery, postoperative pain,efficient care, patient satisfaction in both groups. Results The rate of preoperative anx- iety and postoperative pain in the observation group was significantly Lower than that in the control group;the satisfaction of patients and care efficiency of the observation group were higher as compared to the control group, the difference was significant. Conclusion The nursing interventions for the patients with aortic dissection can mobilize their initiative and treatment compliance,improve the doctor-patient and nurse-patient relationship greatly, ensure that patients can receive an effective treatment, and improve the cure rate and quality of life of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.10