检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海应用技术学院期刊社(筹),上海200235 [2]上海应用技术学院理学院,上海200235
出 处:《科技通报》2014年第2期242-246,共5页Bulletin of Science and Technology
基 金:上海市高等教育学会基金资助项目(ZCGJ50-13);上海应用技术学院高教研究基金资助项目(G2012-14)
摘 要:对2000年至2010年间某地不同类别高校科研综合投入与产出的面板数据采用Pearson简单相关分析和Logistics回归拟合,分析得出投入与产出的正相关性强的关键因子。同时,采用极大似然估计对数据分析并建立相应的科研绩效的高校分类模型,该模型较好地验证了2000年至2010年间不同类别高校的科研绩效实际;研究得出了不同类别高校科研绩效差异预测的点估计和95%Wald可信区间估计范围情况预测概率与观测值之间的关系,定量地解释了不同类别高校科研绩效的差异与发展趋势。模型对于合理评价科研绩效以及对于科研活动进行预测和调控,具有重要的现实意义。A Pearson Simple Correlation Analysis and a Logistics Regression Fitting have been employed to analyze the panel data about the overall inputs and outputs of R&D of various types of universities in a certain area from 2000 to 2010. The strong positive correlation of the key factors between inputs and outputs was obtained. Meanwhile, the Maxi-mum Likelihood Estimation was adopted to analyze the data for the establishment of a classified model of university R&D efficiency of various types,which appropriately verifies the actual efficiency of R&D from 2000 to 2010. The point esti-mation for the prediction of difference in efficiency of R&D between universities was concluded in the paper and the re-lation between observation and prediction probability of 95% Wald confidence interval estimation was also determined. The difference and development tendency of the university R&D efficiency of various types was explained quantification-ally. This modeling has practical significance for the rational evaluation of efficiency of R&D as well as the prediction and regulation of scientific research activity.
分 类 号:G644[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63