检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨燕[1,2]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨师范大学文学院 [2]哈尔滨师范大学俄罗斯文化艺术研究中心
出 处:《俄罗斯文艺》2014年第2期57-63,共7页Russian Literature & Arts
基 金:2013年国家社科基金项目"形式主义诗学视野下的什克洛夫斯基的散文创作研究";哈尔滨师范大学2014年度人文社会科学科研培育基金项目(SXP2014-08)的阶段性成果;项目编号:13BWW036
摘 要:对于20世纪西方文论而言,俄国形式主义诗学的重要性不言而喻,但在众多的研究成果中,其多以集体群像的身份出现,对其每个成员的诗学贡献及其差异的论述则略显单薄。其两个最重要的代表人物什克洛夫斯基和雅各布森尽管有着共同的诗学目标和研究方法,二者的诗学研究均倚重语言学方法而追求科学化,但在具体的理论建构中他们的差异却越来越大、渐行渐远,逐渐呈现出了人文主义和科学主义的不同理论走向,本文基于这两种理论走向对两位形式主义大师的诗学进行比较研究。It is self-evident that the Russian formalist poetics is of great importance to the 20th- century western literary criticism. But it appears as a collective group in the numerous academic researches, and very few researches have been done into the individual members' contribution to the poetics or into the differences between them. As two representative figures of the Russian formalist poetics, Shklovsky and Jakobson had a common goal of poetics and research method, and their poetic researches both relied on linguistic approaches to pursue seientification, but in constructing concrete theories, they differed more and more greatly from each other, and gradually demonstrated different theoretical trends : humanism and scientism, based on which this paper makes a comparative study on the poetic theories of the two masters of formalism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.170.100