没有地区主义的东亚合作  

East Asian Cooperation without Regionalism

作　　者：莫盛凯[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学国际关系学院

出　　处：《当代亚太》2014年第2期96-117,155-156,共22页Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies

摘　　要：针对当前东亚地区主义发展面临的困境,有关争论的焦点已经从关注传统的内部因素差异和外部美国阻碍的初级阶段推进到了对制度变量的关注,但争论双方都普遍接受存在东亚地区主义这一前提假定。然而,地区合作本身并不必然意味着地区主义,存在着一种没有地区主义的地区合作。文章通过对严重泛化、经济化和扭曲化的地区主义概念的重新界定,把地区主义与地区合作区分开来,质疑所谓东亚地区主义本身的存在;以对地区主义概念的推导为基础,提出了一个包含三个检验标准的初步的检验框架,以检验地区主义的存在;应用该框架分析了东亚地区合作的目的和起源、机制现状以及外部因素,认为东亚不存在地区层面的地区主义。在中国崛起并优先寻求与美国建立"新型大国关系"的背景下,亚太跨地区主义而非东亚地区主义将是未来东亚地区合作的前景。The debate over difficulties faced in the development of an East Asian Regionalism has shifted away from its traditional focus on the internal differences between Asian states and external barriers imposed by the United States to consider institutional variables.Despite this shift,both camps universally accept the notion of an East Asian Regionalism.In contrast,this paper argues that cooperation in and of itself does not imply regionalism,and that regional cooperation often occurs in absence of regionalism.It systematically redefines the concept of regionalism,drawing a distinction between regionalism and regional cooperation,and in doing so,questions the very existence of an East Asian regionalism.It asserts a preliminary framework for measuring whether or not regionalism exists which includes three indicators,and applies this framework to consider the objectives and roots of East Asian regional cooperation,institutions and modes of cooperation and external factors.It argues that regionalism does not exist at the regional level in East Asia.As China continues to rise and proactively seeks to establish a new type of great power relationship with the United States,a Trans-Pacific regionalism will likely emerge.

关 键 词：地区主义 东亚地区主义 东亚合作 

分 类 号：D814.1[政治法律—国际关系]