比较法的功能主义原则:危机与出路  

Functional principle in comparative law:crisis and outlet

作　　者：雷安军[1] 

机构地区：[1]宜宾学院法学院,四川宜宾644000

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第1期104-107,共4页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目《比较法研究中功能主义原则的缺陷及其克服》(10XJC820002)。

摘　　要：比较法研究中的功能主义原则是二十世纪比较法研究的方法论基础,该原则来自社会学的功能主义理论。比较法的学术传统借用了社会学的功能主义原则,但却从未对其进行深入的探讨。这导致比较法研究中的功能主义原则缺乏坚实的理论基础,从而受到了许多学者的批评。比较法研究中的功能主义原则面临着巨大的危机,主要体现在缺少对功能概念的界定,未能提出一套观察功能的方法,过分关注相似性,忽视了文化语境以及对功能等值物进行评价时缺少合理的标准。功能主义原则应克服上述问题,并为之进行重构,方能找到出路,继续发挥其在比较法研究中的重要作用。Functional principle is the methodology foundation of comparative law in 20th century, which originates from functionalism of sociology. Comparative academic traditions have never profoundly researched functionalism and accepted functionalism of sociology without thinking. This fact leads to lack of theoretical foundation in comparative law so that comparative law is criticized by many scholars, especially by legal culture scholars and post-modernism scholars. There have been four problems in comparative law： lacking the concept of function and method for watch function, focusing more on similarities, ignoring cultural context and being short of reasonable standard of evaluating functional equivalence. Functional principle in comparative law should solve these problems and be reconstructed so that it can play an important role in comparative research.

关 键 词：茨威格特 克茨 比较法研究 功能主义原则 社会学的功能主义理论 

分 类 号：DF07[政治法律—法学理论]