论著作权法中的“注明出处”——兼评我国《著作权法(第三次修订草案)》相关条款  

On “Making Reference” in Copyright Law:With Additional Studies on Some Provisions in the Draft of the Third Revision of China's Copyright Law

作　　者：牛强[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2014年第5期15-22,共8页Intellectual Property

基　　金：教育部人文社科青年基金项目"网络版权侵权判决实证研究"(项目编号:11YJC820086)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：著作权法中的"注明出处"实为民法中的注意义务在作品利用领域内的体现。"注明出处"要求"归认来源","保护作者精神利益"是其实质内涵,而"防止读者混淆"则是其判断标准。我国《著作权法》中"注明出处"与署名权规则、合理使用制度等相互纠缠,致其制度界限不明、司法定性不统一。《著作权法(第三次修订草案)》虽明确规定了"注明出处",但仍存缺陷。未来修法应把其从"版权限制构成要件"中剥离出来,并规定"注明"的方式、程度及无须"注明"的相关例外情形。此不仅有利于厘清"注明出处"与相关制度间的界限,更能优化著作权制度体系、统一司法裁判标准。“Making reference”in Chinese copyright law is actually a kind of duty of care in civil law. “Making reference” requests identifying sources while its essence and criterion respectively are protecting moral interests of the author and preventing the reader from confusion. Making reference is intertwined with the authorship rules and the fair use doctrine in Chinese copyright law, which resulted in the inconsistency of judicial judgment. The draft of the third revision of China＇s Copyright Law has clearly defined “making reference”, but still flawed. In future legislation, “making reference” should be distinguished from copyright restrictions and be independently regulated. And it is good for optimizing the copyright system as well as the standard of judicial iudmnent.

关 键 词：“注明出处” 法律性质 署名权 著作权法修改 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]