两岸投资争端解决机制的制度创新及其完善  

Cross-Strait Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism:Institutional Innovations and its Improvement

作　　者：季烨[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学台湾研究院法律研究所

出　　处：《台湾研究》2014年第2期39-45,共7页Taiwan Studies

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"双边投资条约对多边贸易体制的影响研究"(项目批准号:T2013221035)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：投资争端解决机制是《海峡两岸投资保障和促进协议》(简称《两岸投资协议》)中体现两岸特色的重要制度创新之一。相较于传统双边投资协议中的投资争端解决机制而言,两岸投资争端解决机制除了引入两岸私人投资争端解决方式,还规定了投资者与投资所在地一方投资争端的协调、协处和调解等多元化机制,实现了单方规定的协议化和国际实践的两岸化,从而有效降低了两岸投资争端的"泛政治化"风险。未来,应进一步完善两岸投资补偿争端的调解程序,确保调解协议的法律约束力和执行力。The investment dispute settlement mechanism with Cross-Strait characteristics is one of most important institutional innovations of the Cross-Strait Agreement on Investment Protection and Promotion （The Cross-Strait Investment Agreement）. Compared with the traditional dispute settlement mechanisms in Sino-for- eign bilateral investment agreements, the Cross-Strait investment dispute settlement mechanism not only in- cludes provisions governing investment-related commercial disputes, but also contains the diversified dispute settlement mechanisms on the settlement of disputes between an investor and the host party, i. e. , coordina- tion, mutual assistance and mediation. Through these mechanisms, the Agreement internalized the unilateral practice of the China's Mainland and international practice of Sino-foreign BIT practice, thus effectively reduced the risk of the politicalization of Cross-Strait investment disputes. In the future, the mediation mechanism of Cross-Strait investment disputes should be improved so as to secure the legal binding force and enforcement of reconciliation agreements.

关 键 词：《海峡两岸投资保障与促进协议》 投资争端 两岸关系 

分 类 号：DF414[政治法律—经济法学]