检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林师范大学政法学院,吉林四平136000 [2]吉林师范大学体育学院,吉林四平136000
出 处:《南京体育学院学报(社会科学版)》2014年第2期91-95,共5页Journal of Nanjing Institute of Physical Education
摘 要:运用文献资料和法学分析方法探讨我国高校体育伤害事故侵权纠纷解决机制。主要结论:高校体育伤害事故归责原则以过错责任、风险责任的二元结构为主,适用过错责任理论和风险领域理论;过错责任归责原则中侵权责任由损害事实、因果关系和过错构成;风险责任归责原则中侵权责任由损害事实、因果关系构成。建议:建立高校限额赔偿制度;《侵权责任法》中应确立危险责任一般条款;建立健全体育伤害商业保险制度;完善体育伤害社会保障制度。The use of literature and analysis of law investigate settlement mechanism abou college sports injuries tort dispute in china. The main conclusions:Responsibility principle of college sports injuries gives priority the dual structure fault liability and risk liability,Applies fault liability theory and risk areas theory;Tort liability constitutes the fact of damage,causality and fault in fault liability responsibility principle;Tort liability constitutes the fact of damage and causality in risk liability responsibility principle. Recommendation:Establish College Compensation Limit of Liability;"Law of Tort Liability"should establish general terms of risk liability;Establish commercial sports injury insurance system;Improve the social security system of sports injuries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15