检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何平[1] 徐玉裕[2] 周侣艳[1] 汪凌佳 叶辉[1] 余海霞[1]
机构地区:[1]杭州市环境监测中心站,浙江杭州310007 [2]杭州市市区河道监管中心,浙江杭州310008
出 处:《浙江大学学报(理学版)》2014年第3期324-330,共7页Journal of Zhejiang University(Science Edition)
基 金:杭州运河(河道)研究院;河道分院河道学研究报告项目
摘 要:以杭州市7条主要河道21个监测断面1循环年的水质监测数据为依据,运用污染指数法和模糊评价法对市区主要河道水质进行综合评价,同时探讨2种水质评价方法的评价效果.结果表明:①杭州市区主要河道均存在不同程度的污染,主要污染物是TN、NH+4-N和TP,即氮磷营养盐,而有机污染相对较小;②污染指数法评价结果与实际水体的标准差距较小,与真实情况吻合较好;③当水质为劣V类时,模糊评价结论偏保守,而当某项指标严重超标时则易使评价结果偏重;④污染指数法更适合杭州市区河道水环境的评价.The data from 21 monitoring intersections of 7 rivers in one cycle year were collected to evaluate the water pollution situation of Hangzhou. The pollution index and fuzzy evaluation methods were applied, and the results from the two methods were compared and discussed. The conclusion indicated that: (1)the rivers were all polluted to some degree, and the predominant pollutants were TN, NH4+-N and TP, namely the nitrogen and phosphorus, while organic pollution was relatively slight; (2)the evaluation results of pollution index method were closer to the actual water standard and agreed with the real situation better; (3)when the level of water quality was inferior V, fuzzy evaluation results were comparatively conservative, however, when one indicator severely exceeded the standard, the result from this method was more serious; (4)The evaluation results of pollution index method were in accordance with the actual situation of main urban rivers in Hangzhou better.
分 类 号:X82[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.122.53