检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王作宝[1]
机构地区:[1]东北大学文法学院社会保障研究所
出 处:《当代青年研究》2014年第3期85-92,共8页Contemporary Youth Research
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费"代际公平视角下的养老保险可持续发展研究"的阶段性研究成果;项目编号:N120314003;辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目"辽宁省居家监护儿童贫困治理研究"的阶段性研究成果;项目编号:L12DSH017
摘 要:均等比旨在更真实地反映不同家庭的需求支出情况,调整不同结构、不同规模家庭的收入差异。对我国数据的分析发现,不同均等比下测得的儿童贫困数值不同。我国儿童相对贫困情况较为严峻,区域和城乡间差异不明显;但绝对贫困情况在城乡之间、区域之间存在差异。应该在我国儿童贫困问题研究中引入均等比的概念,科学测度儿童贫困水平。The equivalence scale (ES) is to truly reflect different needs and expenditure of different families, and to adjust the income differences of families with different composition and size. Some scholars have raised different ES based on their own concern and set different value for ES, which will affect measuring child poverty rate. As to our analysis, there are differences of the poverty rate between different ES. China's child relative poverty is serious and there is no difference between different regions and between rural and urban. But, there are differences as to absolutely poverty. It is necessary to introduce ES in China's child poverty research and strengthen the governance work.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3