检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石婷[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学民商法学院
出 处:《当代青年研究》2014年第3期93-98,共6页Contemporary Youth Research
摘 要:加强国家对未成年人监护的干预力度,是有效保障留守儿童合法权益的需要。在当前国际社会呈现未成年人监护公法化的发展趋势下,考察国家对未成年人监护公权干预的理论基础和社会基础,分析我国现行立法对未成年人监护公权干预之不足有重要意义。同时,可以借鉴法国、德国、日本、瑞士四国未成年人监护公权干预立法情况,提出区分亲权和监护、设立国家公权监护主体、设立未成年人监护监督机构等建议,以期完善我国未成年人监护的公权干预制度。It is necessary to strengthen state intervention of minor guardianship to protect the legitimate rights of stay-at-home children effectively. According to the theoretical basis and social basis of the state intervention of minor guardianship, and the investigation and evaluation of minor guardianship legislation situation of state intervention in France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, the paper analyzes the shortcomings of our country's present legislation of minors guardianship about state intervention, and the current situation of the stay-at-home children problem in our country. The paper also proposes the suggestions of distinguishing the kinsfolk and guardianship, establishing the state guardianship body and supervision body.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.168.130