检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:舒媛[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉理工大学文法学院
出 处:《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第3期34-38,共5页Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
摘 要:惩罚性损害赔偿制度产生于英美法系,我国现行法律已明确将该制度纳入产品责任当中,以更好保护被侵权人的合法权益。我国知识产权法对于权利人保护的立法理念与之具有很多相似性,而现实中所面临的诸多问题也是颇为紧迫与棘手,本文试运用法解释学、比较法、立法学等方法,侧重探寻将惩罚性损害赔偿纳入知识产权领域的法理动因与基础,认为纳入惩罚性损害赔偿制度是十分有必要的,并对建设知识产权惩罚性损害赔偿制度的相关问题进行探讨,提出建议,以期更好地完善我国知识产权法律制度。The system of punitive damages is formed in the Anglo American law system. The current law of our country has clearly put this system into the product liability, to better protect the legitimate interests of the infringee. The legislative idea for the protection of human rights of intellectual property law in China and punitive damages have many similarities. But many problems in reality is quite urgent and difficult. In this paper, through the use of hermeneutics, comparative law, legislative science methods, focusing on exploring the legal reasons and foundations about the punitive damages in the field of inteil.ectual property. The author thinks that the introduction of punitive damages system is very necessary, and puts forward suggestions which based on the related issues of the system of punitive damages in intellectual property rights, in order to better improve our legal system of intellectual property rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15