人格三元结构、生性和文学场——1942年萧军的文学处境分析  

Tripartive Personality Structure,Hatitus and Literary Field ——An Analysis on Xiao Jun'Literary Situation in 1942

作　　者：阎伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学新闻与文化传播学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2014年第2期107-112,共6页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：2013年度湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究重点项目"介入语境中的文学生产及其叙事走向--二战时期中西方作家转型现象的比较研究"(13d127)成果

摘　　要：萧军在延安期间,因为其独立倔强、我行我素的个性,成为唯一没有被整风运动改造的作家。本文将从萧军的"生性"出发,分析造成他1942年在延安文学处境的原因。萧军童年的生活经历,催生了他强悍暴戾的原始本我特性。及至成年,在作为强调独立自由意识的超我形象鲁迅的影响下,逐渐凝固成为"恃独"的"生性"。萧军的"恃独"的"生性",逐渐与延安文学场的位置关系与话语规则产生抵牾,并最终影响了他1942年在延安的文学处境。萧军的生性成为延安众多知识分子品质的表现形态之一。Xiao Jun was the only one writer who had not been converted by the Rectification Movement during his Yenan＇s period because of his personality of stubbornness, independence and imperviousness. This paper will analyse which reason caused Xiao Jun＇s literary situation in 1942. Xiao Jun＇s childhood experiences initiated his original instinct of ruthlessness and cruelty,as he grew up, the original instinct gradually solidified as a ＂dependable independence＂ under the influence of Lu Xun who played a role as superego image of independence and freedom. Xiao Jun＇s habitus gradually generated discord with the positional relationship and course rules of Yenan＇s Literary field, and ultimately affected on his literary situation in 1942. Xiao Jun＇s habitus became one of the manifest qualities of many intellectuals in Ycnan.

关 键 词：萧军 本我 人格 生性 文学场 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]