也论中国物权法上的登记对抗主义  

Also on the Registration Confrontation Doctrine in Chinese Real Right Law

作　　者：郭志京[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《比较法研究》2014年第3期95-113,共19页Journal of Comparative Law

摘　　要：登记对抗的本质是仅赋予第三人以否定(他人)物权变动的权利,而非(自己)取得物权的权利,"不登记不得对抗"规则是交易便捷与保护第三人利益相平衡的结果,对当事人具有风险提示作用,对第三人来说则是调查义务的减轻。对于其理论构造,日本的"权利外观说"有其特定的背景,与我国的立法仅在第三人主观范围上具有相同性,并不具有相同的作用机制。我国登记对抗的理论构造应当坚持第三人主张说;对于第三人的范围,日本经过否定之否定后确立的"背信恶意者排除说"有较大借鉴价值,我国第三人范围中的善意应作扩大化解释。The nature of the registration confrontation is only given to a third party the right to deny real fight transfer, rather than the fight to obtain real right. The rules which the third party in bona fide could not be confronted without other party＇ s registration, as a result of balance between transaction convenience and protection of third party interests, play the role of risk warning to the parties, the reduction of the survey obligations to the third person. For its theoretical structure, the theory of right ap- pearance proposed by Japanese scholars under its specific background only has the similarity with our unique legislation in the third human of scope, but does not have the same function mechanism. The theo retical structure of our registration confrontation in Chinese Real Right Law should adhere to the theory of a third party claims. Regarding the third party of scope, Japan＇ s Theory ＂perfidious malicious exclu- ded＂ established by the negation of negation have great reference value . The good faith in third person of scope should make the magnified explanation.

关 键 词：登记对抗 理论构造 第三人范围 理性基础 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]