检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李长银[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院,山东济南250199
出 处:《历史教学(下半月)》2014年第5期34-40,17,共8页History Teaching
摘 要:《本国史》教科书案首先是一件发生在1929年间的学术史事件。"不承认三皇五帝为事实"是导致这起教科书案发生的直接导火索,而以胡适、顾颉刚为代表的"留学英美派"与"留学法日派"之间的纷争则是其中的真正主因。更值得注意的是,这起教科书案还牵涉到国民党当局与学界的争锋、政治内部的争斗以及商业竞争等复杂的因素,这就注定了这起教科书案绝不仅仅只是一件普通的、限于学界内部纷争的学术事件,更是一个关乎民国年间政、学、商三界的重大历史事件。The case of Chinese history textbook firstly was an academic event, which occurred in 1929. "They didn't admit the existence of the earliest Emperors" was the direct cause of the case, but the main reason was that the school of studying in English and America disputed with the school of studying in France and Japan. It is worth noting that the case also involved complex factors, which include Kuomintang authorities disputed with the academia, internal political combat and commercial competition, which doomed that the case was not only a generally academic event, but also a major historical event related to political circles, academia and Business community of the Republic of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.230.65