论不真正连带债务的价值、功能和存在形态  

On the Contemporary Value,Function and Existence Form of the Unreal Joint Obligation

作　　者：高达[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第3期135-141,共7页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：不真正连带债务起源于德国,乃依靠判例发展完善之民法制度,在早期大陆法系实践中曾发挥重大作用。但不真正连带债务理论从诞生之日起即备受质疑,发展道路艰辛曲折,尤以当代民事法律理论和制度的发达使不真正连带债务制度适用范围大受压缩。文章基于对不真正连带债务理论和实践沿革之梳理,评析当下肯定和否定不真正连带债务之观点及理由,剔除传统不真正连带债务理论所包含之不合理成分,论证不真正连带债务在当代之存在价值,重新界定其适用类型及范围,并就当代民事法律理论和制度体系下如何具体构建不真正连带债务制度提出笔者之微见。The unreal joint obligation originated in Germany. It is a civil law system developed on cases, and has played a tremendous role in the early civil law practice. But unreal joint obligation theory was questioned a lot since the date it was proposed. It has been developing in a winding path. Especially the prosperity of contemporary civil law theory and system brings a greatly compression to the area of application of the unreal joint obligation. This paper reviews the theoretical and practical developing history of the unreal joint obligation, introduces and com- ments the affirmative and negative view of the unreal joint obligation and their basis, eliminates the unreasonable elements of traditional unreal joint obligation theory, demonstrates the contemporary existing value of the unreal joint obligation, redefines the types and scope of its application, and puts forward some suggestions about how to construct the unreal joint obligation system under the contemporary civil law theory and system.

关 键 词：不真正连带债务 连带债务 请求权让与 求偿权 终局责任人 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]