检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东北大学轧制技术与连轧自动化国家重点实验室,辽宁沈阳110819
出 处:《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》2014年第5期676-680,共5页Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基 金:"十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAF04B01)
摘 要:为了研究基于层流冷却(加强型冷却)和采用有压射流冷却水进行冷却(超快冷)这两种技术方案下冷却强度的差异,采用数值计算方法得到了不同水流密度和冷却方式下带钢表面换热系数,并进行对比分析.结果表明:在水流密度相同时,超快冷的换热系数显著高于加强型冷却;在加强型冷却方式下随着水流密度的提高,带钢表面换热系数也随之升高,当达到一定值后,再次提高水流密度,换热系数会随之降低,但在超快冷方式下,换热系数并未出现明显的下降趋势.To study the difference of cooling intensity obtained between the two technical methods for cooling the hot rolled strips of laminar cooling ( intensive cooling) and using pressurized jet of cooling water for ultral fast cooling( UFC), a numerical calculation method was used to get heat transfer coefficients between the surface of hot strips and the cooling water under different cooling methods and mass fluxes. By comparison of the results some conclusions were obtained: the cooling capacity of the ultra-fast cooling is greater than that of the intensive cooling method with the same mass flux. The heat transfer coefficient of the surface of hot strips increases with the increase of the mass flux and after reached to an certain value, it decreases with the increase of the mass flux when using the intensive cooling method. However the heat transfer coefficient doesn' t decrease obviously when using the ultra-fast cooling method.
关 键 词:超快冷 加强型冷却 冷却强度 水流密度 换热系数
分 类 号:TP335.55[自动化与计算机技术—计算机系统结构]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222