产业结构调控与中国区域全要素生产率增长  

Industrial Structure Regulation and China's Regional Total Factor Productivity Growth

作　　者：张少辉[1] 李江帆[1] 张承平[2] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学管理学院 [2]琼州学院理工学院

出　　处：《管理学报》2014年第6期898-905,共8页Chinese Journal of Management

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学重大课题资助项目(11JZD023)

摘　　要：运用方向性距离函数，在既考虑“好”产出、又考虑“坏”产出的环境全要素生产率的基础上，进一步将“好”产出划分为“实物”产出和“服务”产出。测算1995—2010年中国各省区在不同程度产业结构调控下的全要素生产率指数及其成份，并尝试解释中国现实产业结构调控程度的选择原因。研究发现：产业结构调控出发点应该侧重于经济稳定增长；大力发展生产服务业，有利于产业结构调控对经济增长率的促进作用；较之中、西部地区，东部地区的经济增长率较低，但经济增长稳定性较强；中国现实产业结构调控程度是两方面力量的博弈结果。Based on the environmental total factor productivity which considers ＂good＂ output and ＂bad＂ output together, this paper uses directional distance function, further divides the ＂good＂ output into ＂tangible＂ output and ＂service＂ output, measures China＇s regional total factor productivity index and its compositions from 1995 to 2010 under 3 different degrees of industrial structure regulation, and tries to explain the reason of China industrial structure regulation degree in reality. The main con- clusions are. Industry structure regulation should emphasize on stable economic growth; Developing producer services can promote economic growth effect of industrial structure regulation; The economic growth rate of eastern region is lower than middle and western region in China, but contrary to the economic growth stability. China＇s industrial structure regulation degree in reality is the result of the game between 2 sides.

关 键 词：产业结构调控 全要素生产率 方向性距离函数 Malmquist—Luenberger生产率指数 

分 类 号：C93[经济管理—管理学]