检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《实用妇产科杂志》2014年第5期373-376,共4页Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
摘 要:目的:系统评价紧急避孕药与异位妊娠发生的关系,为更好地预防异位妊娠提供依据。方法:采用Cochrane系统评价方法,计算机检索Embase、Pubmed、中国知网、维普、万方数据库,检索时限从1990~2012年,纳入紧急避孕药与异位妊娠发生的病例一对照研究。由评价者选择文献、提取资料、评价质量并交叉核对后,用Review5.0软件进行统计分析,计算纳入病例一对照研究的合并优势比(OR)及其95%CI。结果:纳入11个痛例一对照研究(病例组2059例,对照组3996例),其质量评价均6分以上。Meta分析结果显示,紧急避孕药与异位妊娠之间存在明显的关联性,合并计算的OR 3.27,95%CI(2.64~4.06)。结论:紧急避孕药增加异位妊娠的风险,但由于纳入的文献研究数量较少,上述结论尚需开展更多高质量研究。Objective: To review and evaluate theliteratures about the association between emergency contraceptive and the risk of ectopic pregnancy, providing the evidence for prevention of ectopic pregnancy. Methods:Relevant retrospective nested case-control studies from 1990 -2012 were identified by systemati- cally searching Embase, Pubmed, CNKI, Weipu, Wangfang. The following original data were extracted in a standardized manner from eligible studies: author, study design. The incorporated OR(odds ratio) and 95% CI of case-control studies were calculated, respectively. Results:l 1 case-control studies with 6 score or more in quality evaluation were included. Result of meta-analysis of these studies showed a significant association be-tween emergency contraceptive and ectopic Pregnancy,with an OR value of 3.27 and 95% CI of 2.64 -4. 06. Conclusions:Oral emergency contraceptive increases the risk of ectopic pregnancy, However, more high-quality researches are needed to confirm the findings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.31.198