检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王怀强[1]
出 处:《青海民族研究》2014年第2期90-95,共6页Qinghai Journal of Ethnology
基 金:作者主持国家社会科学基金项目<民族区域自治制度功能问题实证研究>阶段成果;批准号:13XMZ002
摘 要:新时期民族关系领域深刻变化影响,关于中国民族政策评价及未来走向问题,理论界产生了严重分歧与争论。民族问题"文化化"、"公民化"理论和族际政治理论是其中两种代表性观点,前者主张全面反思与重构当代中国民族政策,后者则从族际政治视角对现行政策进行理论阐释与辩护。比较分析发现,两种理论取向在对中国民族问题治理提出各自深刻见解的同时,也都存在某些理论盲点,影响了各自理论与现实的契合性。未来应进一步加强不同主张间的理性交流与对话,以期取得更多共识与建设性意见。Serious divergence and dispute on Chinese national policy assessment and future heading were aroused among theory field under the influence of deep changes of national relationships of new period. Theory of "culturalization" and "citizenize" and theory of Ethnic politics are two main representative standpoints about national problems, the former proposes comprehensive reflection and rebuilt contemporary Chinese national policy, while the latter makes theoretical explanation and defending about current policy from the view of Ethnic politics. Analysis obtained from the comparison show that two theoretical orientations presented respective profound opinions about Chinese national problems and have some theoretical blind points as well which affected the match between the realities and the theory respectively. More rational talking and communication are needed among disagreeable opinions for attaining more consensuses and constructive suggestions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117