检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《财经理论与实践》2014年第3期60-64,共5页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基 金:湖南省社科基金(13YBA075)
摘 要:以2009~2012年连续四年披露研发投入的中国上市公司为样本,实证检验政治联系、债务融资对企业研发投入行为的影响。结果表明,企业的研发投入面临债务融资约束,债务融资比例(银行借款)与研发投入强度之间呈现负相关关系,长期借款对研发投入强度的债务制约作用比短期借款更大,政治联系对企业的研发投入产生了"挤占"效应,抑制了R&D投资,虽然给企业带来了一定的长期债务资源,但并未能如预期产生显著的"资源效应",扭转企业债务融资困境。On the basis of listed companies R^D investment data from 2009 to 2011 ,this pa- per empirically studies the influence of political connection and debt financing have on a firm's R&D investment. It is suggested that there is an inverse correlation between the ratio of debt financing (bank loans) and the R&D investment intensity. Due to a large amount of short-term debts, firms fail to reverse the debt financing constraints. Although political connections bring certain long-term debt resources to firms, they fail to generate significant "resource effect" and do not drive up firms" R&D investment as expected. On the contrary, political connections also bring "crowding-out" effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249