检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨彬艳[1] 孙海冰[1] 龚其海[1] 余兰[1]
出 处:《湖北农业科学》2014年第5期1159-1161,1165,共4页Hubei Agricultural Sciences
基 金:贵州省科技厅科研攻关项目[黔科合S字(2007)1043];遵义市科学技术项目[遵科合(2006)016]
摘 要:比较微波消解法和灰化法处理对洛龙党参(Codonopsis pilosula)中金属元素含量测定的差别。采用原子吸收光谱法对采自贵州遵义道真仡佬族苗族自治县的野生党参、鲜党参、4个栽培党参中几种金属元素(Pb、Cd、Cu、Zn、Mn、Ca、Fe、Cr)含量进行了测定。结果表明,在6份样品中,重金属元素含量符合《药用植物及制剂进出口绿色行业标准》中的规定,样品中Ca元素充分,富含微量元素Zn、Mn、Fe和Cr。党参的生长条件对其金属元素含量几乎无明显影响。微波消解法简便、快速、准确、灵敏度高。Analysis was performed on the contents of metallic elements in 6 different growing Codonopsis pilosula by microwave digestion method and dry-ashing digestion method. The metallic elements of Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, Mn, Ca, Fe, Cr in samples were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry(AAS). The results of comparing the applicability and the differences between the two methods showed that heavy metal content was in accordance with the stipulation of the Green Trade Standards of Importing Medicinal Plants. Ca was full and trace elements Zn, Mn, Fe and Cr were rich in the samples. The cultivation method of Codonopsis pilosula on the metal content had no significant effect. The method of microwave digestion method was simple, rapid, accurate. There was high sensitivity between two methods of sample preparation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222